VoIP wiretapping required, deal sealed

Original post: click here

Subscribe to these comments

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)

Neutral

Brian @ Jun 10th 2006 3:51PM

I, for one (and probably the ONLY one), an quite ok with this. The moment someone is going to threaten national security, they've lost their freedoms. Now... the moment the government uses this AGAINST its stated purpose (i.e. non national security issues) then I'll be up in arms like the rest of you.

And no, I'm not a republican. I'm just aware that unbridled freedom doesn't actually exist. Besides, what do I have to fear, I'm not doing anything wrong that would attract the attention of the federal government. They've got better things do to than snoop in on what me and my roomies are planning for our friend's bachelor party.

Add your comments

New Users

Name

E-mail

Current Users

E-mail:

Password

Remember Me

E-Mail me when someone replies to this comment

replying to thread #1593691

Add your comments:

Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.

When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.

To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.

Please note that gratuitous links to your site are viewed as spam and may result in removed comments. And yes, comments are moderated.